The Human Resources function was not effectively linked to the business, and the HR organization was struggling to frame HR issues in business terms. In order to bring silo'd divisions together and create one, unified platform for HR business processes, this organization outsourced its HR systems and processes, creating an urgent need for members of the HR function to reframe their role and capabilities. Not only was this an HR transformation, but also a business process and change management proposition in an organization that was not skilled at designing, facilitating and realizing the benefits of widespread organizational change.
The HR function lacked a plan, not only to engage HR itself, but to also engage the wider organization, and it didn't help that the biggest source of resistance to change was coming from members of the HR organization itself. People knew that because of the outsourcing, that jobs would be eliminated, and they were struggling to visualize what their new roles would/could be, and how they needed to prepare themselves to be successful in the new organization.
This meant, getting aligned on the HR business case for change and internalizing it, learning new skills and capabilities aligned with business needs, working as a newly formed cross-organizational team, ensuring that HR's history of "false starts" wasn't repeated so that confidence and credibility among business leaders by executing flawlessly could be built.
The main objectives of this effort were to ensure that the new HR organization would be able to:
Organizations that outsource HR's transactional activities save money and gain a flexible, scalable, and improved process for delivering services. They also create an extraordinary opportunity to re-contract with line managers to provide strategic, value-added services. How can OD professionals help create a higher-performance organization, where HR is a strategic partner to the business? This organization partnered with Interaction Associates to solve this dilemma.
This collaborative change effort was characterized by its complexity and scope. It was a short-term implementation with long- term, sustainable change expectations attached to it. It was an effort that touched the work, processes, systems, roles, skills and structure of HR service delivery — a complete transformation of the HR model.
Multiple stakeholders were involved, including senior executives, the entire HR function, and ultimately all managers and employees, as well as the outsourcing vendor team. To be successful and to realize the business case for the investment, this change had to be widely supported and adopted at all levels of the organization. With all of these variables in mind, the vision for the implementation and roll-out of the change centered on a collaborative change approach. There were too many stakeholders with too many interests and agendas which required the HR function to lead the change while maintaining superior service, re-defining its strategic role, rebranding the function, developing new skills, and work across functions and business as an aligned team — never before had this been done.
By using Interaction Associates' Collaborative Change Management Framework, the HR organization was able to transform itself from a transactional cost center to a highly effective strategic business partner. Collaborative change is the practice of designing and implementing complex organizational change in a way that involves the right people at the right time in order to create and implement a strategic, robust and collectively owned future state; it involves aligning and mobilizing three key levers for success:
In the direction phase, we worked with key stakeholders and HR leaders to determine the transformation goals and strategy of the outsourcing effort, identify the portfolio of services that would be offered, and the way they would be delivered to the customer. In this phase the HR organization was redesigned, and tasks, job definitions, relationships and respective responsibilities that enabled the core business process were assessed and defined. Making the case for change was a critical element of this phase. Some of the outcomes of this phase were: Alignment among senior executive change sponsors around a clear vision, case for change, goals and metrics, the change strategy, key leadership behaviors, and decision-making processes and authority.
In the commitment phase, the people most responsible for driving the change were enrolled and aligned behind the initiative. Roles were defined and operating agreements made. This highly collaborative process was the main key to success. The major outcome of this phase was to create a laser-sharp focus on the people (involvement) and process (transparency) side of the change by utilizing stakeholder involvement on the front-end we were able to reduce the cycle-time of resistance that often derails major change efforts.
In the capability phase, needed competencies were identified and assessed across the HR organization. HR designed and delivered a process for building and maintaining the individual and team competencies needed to fulfill the future vision of the new HR organization. Our focus in this phase was to build both individual and organizational skills to lead and implement collaborative change and to operate as internal, value-added "consultants" and "thought partners" for business leaders throughout the organization.
As a result of our partnership, our client was able to:
View next Case Study: In Conversation With: Agilent [3]
To schedule a consultation, contact us today [4]
Links:
[1] http://www.interactionassociates.com/clients/case-studies/case-study-medical-devices
[2] http://www.interactionassociates.com/sites/default/files/Meddevicecase.pdf
[3] http://www.interactionassociates.com/services/cs_agilent.html
[4] http://www.interactionassociates.com/about_us/contact.html
[5] http://www.interactionassociates.com/comment/reply/318#comment-form
[6] http://www.interactionassociates.com/filter/tips